Question… did Her Majesty The Queen, the human being from the House of Windsor, give her signature to the Lisbon Treaty and thereby breach her coronation oath… or was the Lisbon Treaty endorsed by THE CROWN, the corporation?
Trot over to The Talking Clock to find out.
Important question that, because it begins to unravel the can of worms that is our Government, like the equally important question of who are the secret shareholders of the Bank of England. I know you don’t know, and I bet you cannot find out.
The word Eurosceptic has been hijacked by those who think reform from the inside is possible. Its not. 
Many thanks for the link and glad that you seem to think we’re looking at an important jigsaw puzzle piece.
TTC
TTC,
Most welcome. Important questions they are.
Pingback: Lisbon Treaty – who signed for UK? | The Albion Alliance presents
Sorry to use your excellent blog in order to communicate with TTC Ian, but as I can’t post a comment on TTC’s site (registering for commenting is too technical for my poor old brain), I just wanted to ask if there’s any way TTC can alter the procedure for commenting so there’s no need to register. I’m sure that more comments would be posted on there if it was made easier to do so.
I also wanted to thank him/her for the excellent ‘Crown v Crown’ post yesterday, which I have distributed around various other blogs such as EUReferendum, Orphans of Liberty, etc. Glad to see it’s being followed up on here too.
I’ve been doing some digging around re Coats of Arms and have discovered the following (capitals are mine:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_coat_of_arms_of_the_United_Kingdom
‘…The British Government also uses the Royal Coat of Arms as a national symbol of the United Kingdom, and, in that capacity, the Coat of Arms can be seen on several government documents and forms, passports,’…
(COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE COAT OF ARMS ON YOUR PASSPORT – THE GOVERNMENT’S COAT OF ARMS – TO QUEEN ELIZABETH’S COAT OF ARMS. THE COAT OF ARMS ON THE PASSPORT IS NOT THE SAME. THE FLEUR DE LYS ARE MISSING AS IS THE LION STANDING ATOP THE CROWN!)
‘…in the entrance to embassies and consulates, etc. However, when used by the government and not by the sovereign herself, the coat of arms is often represented without the helm. ( BECAUSE THEY ARE PERPETUATING A MASIVE FRAUD AGAINST THE PEOPLE! SO WHICH DOCUMENTS DO AND DO NOT HAVE QUEEN ELIZABETH’S COAT OF ARMS ON THEM AND WHY WOULD THERE BE A NEED TO USE TWO DIFFERENT COATS OF ARMS – I THINK YOU CAN
PROBABLY BEGIN TO MAKE A PRETTY GOOD GUESS BY NOW)?
NOW THIS IS INTERESTING :
http://www.woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/customs/questions/motto.html
NOTICE WHAT’S MISSING FROM THE BLUE & WHITE IMAGE – ‘The Official Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’? YES – FLEUR DE LYS AND THE LION ATOP THE CROWN .
THEY THEN HAVE THE NEXT IMAGE (A PHOTO), LISTED AS ‘The Royal Coat of Arms’ (NOT THE WORD ‘ROYAL’ WHICH IS MSSING FROM ‘THE ‘The OFFICIAL Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’.
These are two completely different coats of arms. The first one – the ‘official’ coat of arms (Her Majesty The Queen – the corporation referred to in the recording on TTC), is the one I am now convinced is being used to commit fraud against the British people and the second one is Queen Elizabeth’s (the woman)– the upholder of the Common Law.
Note the differences in the wiki web addresses above and below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_coat_of_arms_of_the_United_Kingdom#Government
Yes – that’s right; the coat of arms of the government!
‘…Her Majesty’s Government uses a version of the Royal Arms but without the helm or crest, as a result of which the crown sits atop the shield’…
(AND WHAT THE FCUK IS ‘HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT’? WELL, TIME TO CHECK OUT http://talking-clock.blogspot.com/2011/08/crown-vs-crown.html PEOPLE, IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY. IT IS NOT Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth of the House of Windsor as we all assume. Oh what a tangled web of deceit they have woven…
Sorry, that should state ‘NOTE the word Royal…’ under the website
http://www.woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/customs/questions/motto.html
It’s a quite critical point about Crown V Crown.
JH, yes it is, but unfortunately one that most do not understand.